Why should the Bible not be translated into AAVE? While calling it the "Black Bible Chronicles" presumes that it would aid all black people in understanding the Bible, which is obviously untrue, if the content communicates effectively (though I do not claim to know much about this translation specifically), why should this content not exist? What is the purpose of language if not effective communication? Judging one language or dialect as superior to another seems a terribly subjective endeavor, and one more likely to manifest classism or regional chauvinism than have any productive outcome. Languages indeed evolve, and as they do, they manifest different parts of the human experience. I consider language one of the greatest separations between man and beast, if one is to make such a separation. It is too integral to our human identity for us to say that one language is better than another.
Thus, while I, as well as other members of this forum, enjoy Latin and find that it is beneficial in all sorts of ways in studies and in growth as a person, I do not consider it as necessary a language as more common ones in our day and age. I think that people should learn whatever language or languages they need for other activities, and then they should learn whatever language or languages they want to for pleasure and to increase their understanding of the world. Study of Latin entails and intimate connection with Roman culture and history that opens a new world to the student of Latin, but the same is true for all of the thousands of languages parts of our species speak or have spoken. I believe that everyone should be made aware of benefits of the study of Latin and materials and instruction should be available, but that this should be true for as many languages as possible. Study of Latin is wonderful, but should not be required in schools, should be encouraged but should not be forced.
I am inclined to disagree. Latin, I still say, gives us the key to our patrimony as the heirs of Western Civilisation. Greek does so as well. Understandably, the average student has neither the time nor the interest to do two languages, plus a foreign language, plus English.
However, it is entirely possible, by lengthening the school day by an hour, to insist that students get, along with English and a foreign language of their choice, Latin. I choose Latin over Greek because there IS a need for it, contrary to my friend Gaia's position. And Latin, unlike Greek, is a bit easier to learn since the alphabet is the same. Also, the grammar helps one learn any Romance language with ease, and virtually any European language, including English, the only exceptions being possibly Basque, Finnish, and Magyar.
What is the need for Latin? Simple: to build a more civilised, more cultured society. We are, at least in the USA, turning more and more into a nation of Couch Potato Blobs. All most Americans do is sit on their fat tuchuses watching football, putting on the pounds while eating Ho-Hos and Dingdongs and drinking beer. With Latin, we can be a nation of readers, studying everything from the Gallic Wars to Virgil. IN THE ORIGINAL LATIN! Who wouldn't want to do that!