Yes, and it has the advantage of brevity.Heroes numquam moriuntur
But herus is already an alternate spelling of erus, which it is far more likely to be mistaken for than understood correctly as some weird Medieval variant of heros that I'd never heard of before.Vir is not exactly the same as heros (which also exists as herus, i in Medieval Latin), however they can be synonyms in certain contexts. But for the modern sense of the word, I think herus is better.
Well, there are some poems called Carmina Burana. In the 1930's Carl Orff composed the music for some of them. In one of the poems (a very recorded version, by the way) you will find this:But herus is already an alternate spelling of erus, which it is far more likely to be mistaken for than understood correctly as some weird Medieval variant of heros that I'd never heard of before.
I have a couple of verses but you make me doubt about whether it is actually a variant or some other meaning. The most common word that is translated by hero is vir.I'm aware of the Carmina Burana: as you say, it's a rather well known compendium. In this particular poem, however, hera and herus respectively mean 'mistress' and 'master', so I can't see its relevance to the question whether herus is a Medieval variant of heros. Do you have any other source as a basis upon which you assert this?
Like Imber Ranae, I've only ever seen herus as a mere variant spelling of erus, "master".I have a couple of verses but you make me doubt about whether it is actually a variant or some other meaning.
I doubt it. Vir simply means "man", or at best "true (courageous, virile enough, etc.) man" - as the English "man" does too in fact, as in "come if you're a man" - but not "hero". I would think that the word most commonly translated as "hero" was, unsurprisingly, heros.The most common word that is translated by hero is vir.
? Strange idea. Look up the definition in any dictionary.I doubt that vir means simply a man, alone.
The "remarkableness" is then expressed by the adjective, rather than by "vir". And "vir" can also be seen with negative adjectives, or simply alone meaning nothing more than "man", really. But again a look at a dictionary will suffice to confirm you this. It can (but isn't necassarily) be used with the connotation "real man" as I said above, but between this and "hero" there's quite a bit of a stretch.remarkable, someone that can be admired and it is frequently used with other adjctives to denote the quality of that vir.