"Always one"

[RobynsLee]

I am seeking the translation from English to Latin to convey the phrase "always one", to use in a logo/emblem.

"Always one meaning that all things come from the same source and spirit. Oneness. That despite labels we are always one. To hopefully help with the description, what I DON'T want it to mean is "together we are stronger".

Hope my description can convey the right meaning for translating as it doesn't seem to be as simple as I originally thought. Thanks in advance for any help.

 

[Glabrigausapes]

(Omnes) Semper Unum
'(All) [are] always one [thing].'

 

[RobynsLee]

(Omnes) Semper Unum
'(All) [are] always one [thing].'

Wow, thank you : ) so just to confirm even though you can leave out (Omnes) the two words would be sufficiently correct to the meaning?

 

[Glabrigausapes]

so just to confirm even though you can leave out (Omnes) the two words would be sufficiently correct to the meaning?

Yes, although I will say that it matches in its grammar the abstractness of the English. That is, were a Roman to read it, he would probably be puzzled.

 

[RobynsLee]

Yes, although I will say that it matches in its grammar the abstractness of the English. That is, were a Roman to read it, he would probably be puzzled.

Fair enough!! thank you again. Robyn

 

[Agrippa]

Cf. Ouroboros (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouroboros): ἓν τὸ πᾶν ("Hèn tò pan", i.e. "The All is One", Latin: "Summa rerum unum" = "Omnia unum"):

Omnia unum

 

[RobynsLee]

That’s interesting- thanks for posting the link. I’m not understanding your suggestion though..

 

[rothbard]

That’s interesting- thanks for posting the link. I’m not understanding your suggestion though..

I think Agrippa's sounds like a closer translation of what you want to say, i.e. that all things come from the same source and spirit.

 

[RobynsLee]

Thanks for your input for that. I’m getting what you mean and I think in that sense it does feel more connected to the message.

 

[RobynsLee]

Question- would “universus” also be a contender?

 

[Agrippa]

Question- would “universus” also be a contender?

You mean "universum", I suppose. My answer: yes.
Cf. Meister Eckhart, medieval German philosopher, in his Expositio libri Genesis cap. 1 § 12
(https://www.google.de/books/edition/Meister_Eckhart_Studienausgabe_der_Latei/Z_N3DwAAQBAJ?hl=de&gbpv=1&dq=Sed+hoc+unum+est+ipsum+totum+universum,+quod+a+deo+procedit,+unum+quidem+in+multis+partibus+universi,+sicut+deus+ipse+producens+est+unus+sive+unum+simplex+...&pg=PA38&printsec=frontcover):

Sed hoc unum est ipsum totum universum, quod a deo procedit, unum quidem in multis partibus universi

 

[syntaxianus]

I would say

Semper ex unâ et eâdem [rê].

Always from one and the same [reality].