Liber VI Cap VI si recepissent

cinefactus

Censor
Staff member
Ille obsidibus acceptīs hostium sē habitūrum numerō cōnfirmat, sī aut Ambiorigem aut eius lēgātōs fīnibus suīs recēpissent.

Why the pluperfect subjunctive? I would have thought it should be receperint for future or reciperent if it were unreal.
 

Pacifica

grammaticissima
Staff member
What would have been future perfect in direct speech becomes pluperfect subjunctive in past indirect speech.

The direct speech would have been:

"Hostium," inquit, "numero habebo, si aut Ambiorigem aut eius legatos finibus vestris receperitis."
He said: "I will consider you as enemies if you receive (lit. will have received) either Ambiorix or his ambassadors into your territory."

The past indirect speech becomes what you've quoted, meaning "He affirmed that he would consider them as enemies if they received (lit. had received) either Ambiorix..."

This literal "had received" doesn't mean an action that had been completed before the time of speaking but an action that would potentially be completed before that of considering them as enemies.

For more on the sequence of tenses and such in indirect statement, you can read Dantius's post here.
 
Top