I've confused myself again.
"Ac plerisque rogitantibus dimissi ecquod feminis quoque asylum aperuissent:"
I have it as; and many( states) were asking repeatedly if the( legati) who had been sent away had opened the asylum for women also.
Dimissi according to one commentary is just a PPP and is the subject of aperuissent. This is what I've got, I take it that it's come away from the indirect question for some reason?
The other commentary says it's dimissi (sunt) but to me that sounds wrong?
Could someone clarify for me what's happening in this sentence?
Thanks
"Ac plerisque rogitantibus dimissi ecquod feminis quoque asylum aperuissent:"
I have it as; and many( states) were asking repeatedly if the( legati) who had been sent away had opened the asylum for women also.
Dimissi according to one commentary is just a PPP and is the subject of aperuissent. This is what I've got, I take it that it's come away from the indirect question for some reason?
The other commentary says it's dimissi (sunt) but to me that sounds wrong?
Could someone clarify for me what's happening in this sentence?
Thanks