Saluete socii,
conor legere (-endum?) illum librum ut Marcilii Ficini visionem Platonis opera invenire, atque intellegere, si potero.
Puto vero me oculi maiores quam stomacho habisse.
Etiam lego, die post die, verbem ad verbem... quanto, in secunda phrase e prima pagina introductionis invenio unum verbum ("fuere") quod non intellego.
Puto typographem se cum "fuit" ad usus indicative passive pluperfect esse. Sic in prima phrase, inveni unum typographo errorem (charissimi =>clarissimi).
But this big error would be much surprising, this is why I consecro your help for understand this sentence.
There is how I understand the sentence : "How many times, I'm asking, Aristot's, Demosthen's, Homeros's, Hippocrat's, Galen's, Cicero's, Virgil's, Plin's, and other's who created (not sure I get what ejusdem means) memorial texts, have (has ?) been edited ?
Waiting for your help, gratas ante vobis ago, vale !
conor legere (-endum?) illum librum ut Marcilii Ficini visionem Platonis opera invenire, atque intellegere, si potero.
Puto vero me oculi maiores quam stomacho habisse.
Etiam lego, die post die, verbem ad verbem... quanto, in secunda phrase e prima pagina introductionis invenio unum verbum ("fuere") quod non intellego.
Puto typographem se cum "fuit" ad usus indicative passive pluperfect esse. Sic in prima phrase, inveni unum typographo errorem (charissimi =>clarissimi).
But this big error would be much surprising, this is why I consecro your help for understand this sentence.
There is how I understand the sentence : "How many times, I'm asking, Aristot's, Demosthen's, Homeros's, Hippocrat's, Galen's, Cicero's, Virgil's, Plin's, and other's who created (not sure I get what ejusdem means) memorial texts, have (has ?) been edited ?
Waiting for your help, gratas ante vobis ago, vale !