This is the gloss for 1 John 1:6 which probably needs correction if someone can check it out? Thank you!
Si dixerimus. Hactenus commendatio epistolae; hic ostendit qualiter charitas sit habenda. Et in tenebris, etc. Persistentes in peccatis, et alios obscurantes non computantur in membris ejus; unde: Quae conventio Christi ad Belial? quae societas lucis ad tenebras? II Cor. 6.
If we say. Thus far by the commending of the letter, here he shows how love is to be held. And walk in darkness, and so on. The persisting in sins and the darkening of others are not reckoned in the members thereof: whence: What concord has Christ with Belial? And what communion has light with darkness? 2 Cor. 6.
Si dixerimus. Hactenus commendatio epistolae; hic ostendit qualiter charitas sit habenda. Et in tenebris, etc. Persistentes in peccatis, et alios obscurantes non computantur in membris ejus; unde: Quae conventio Christi ad Belial? quae societas lucis ad tenebras? II Cor. 6.
If we say. Thus far by the commending of the letter, here he shows how love is to be held. And walk in darkness, and so on. The persisting in sins and the darkening of others are not reckoned in the members thereof: whence: What concord has Christ with Belial? And what communion has light with darkness? 2 Cor. 6.