utervis, utravis, utrumvis

[BadButBit]

I'm defining the declensions for this adjective : Whichever of the two
and I think its
M.sg.
utervis
utrivis
utrovis
utrumvis
utrovis
utervis
M.pl.
utrivis
utrorumvis
utrisvis
utrosvis
utrisvis
utrivis

F.sg.
utravis
utraevis
utraevis
utramvis
utravis
utravis
F.pl.
utraevis
utrarumvis
utrisvis
utrasvis
utrisvis
utraevis

N.sg.
utrumvis
utrivis
utrovis
utrumvis
utrovis
utrumvis
N.pl.
utravis
utrorumvis
utrisvis
utravis
utrisvis
utravis

is this correct?

 

[Glabrigausapes]

It’s correct except for the gen. & dat. singular, which belong to the ‘pronominal’ class, thus:
utriusvīs (same for all genders), gen.
utrīvīs (for all genders), dat.

 

[BadButBit]

yes... that's right. -ius exceptions... I'll make the corrections "unus nauta"!

thanks