Yeah, that makes sense from a Numidian perspective but not from Hasdrubal's, hence me wondering if I'm missing something.
If this is to be believed (and I don't doubt it as Polybius was right in the middle of all this with Scipio) then it does seem rather strange, considering by this time Numidia's absolute dominance of the North African coast, it's relationship with Rome and the very fact Hasdrubal's actions against Rome left him sod-all in the bargaining chips department. Or perhaps it's just pure desperation.
Sidenote to any who're Polybius readers, longshot but worth a try.
Why does Polybius pertain to Golosses as king of the Numidians? If any of Masinissa's sons deserve that title than surely it's Micipsa? Now Micipsa did seem to waver in his support for Rome and judging by Scipio's later remarks to said king (according to Polybius), leads me to wonder if there's been a misprint in the Histories at some point, between the three Numidian sons of Masinissa. I'm basing this assumption on Golosses being Galussa (given charge of war) but even this I can't pin down by date.
I think I need to crack open Appian in the hope he fills in the gaps.
Any info pertaining to this above Numidian query will be appreciated.