Mihi Galba Otho Vitellius nec beneficio nec iniuria cogniti. dignitatem nostram a Vespasiano inchoatam, a Tito auctam, a Domitiano longius provectam non abnuerim: sed incorruptam fidem professis neque amore quisquam et sine odio dicendus est. Quod si vita suppeditet, principatum divi Nervae et imperium Traiani, uberiorem securioremque materiam, senectuti seposui, rara temporum felicitate ubi sentire quae velis et quae sentias dicere licet.
How do you understand this quod. I think the sentence would function well without it at the same time I have no good idea what it woul reffer to. My only idea is to put it as apposition with materiam. Any thoughts?
How do you understand this quod. I think the sentence would function well without it at the same time I have no good idea what it woul reffer to. My only idea is to put it as apposition with materiam. Any thoughts?