This looks a bit too elliptical, and there's no reason for having the subjunctive in one verb and not in the other. As this is a generalizing "you", you could have the subjunctive in both verbs, though the indicative is also possible; but I see nothing that justifies mixing the two. Perhaps you thought it was an indirect question, but it isn't."qui eligas es"
... ſed haud ſtultiſſimumGoogle tells me
"Vos qui volueris"
"Action vincet timor"
I would not think 'is' were necessary,I'd say perhaps qui esse eligas is sis/qui esse eligis is es, or perhaps qui esse velis is sis/qui esse vis is es.
Not absolutely necessary for grammatical correctness, but I think it adds a fitting nuance.I would not think 'is' were necessary,
I don't understand your reasoning.unless perhaps I were beginning with 'quicumque'.
I probably do not underſtand it myſelf, but there we are.I don't understand your reasoning.
Pacis puella dixit: ↑
Eligas/eligis is more literal for "choose" whereas velis/vis is more "want/wish",
= but not stupid (Google). I think you can add more insight. Please enlighten.... ſed haud ſtultiſſimum
= but not stupid (Google). I think you can add more insight. Please enlighten.